Kamala Harris wasn’t handled with child gloves.
Fourth graders savaged the vice chairman and Democratic nominee as a part of a “research” carried out by professors at Stanford College and Arizona State College and reported Wednesday by CNN’s Anderson Cooper.
“What’s the primary phrase that pops into your head once you hear the title Kamala Harris?” requested Arizona State professor Asheley Landrum.
“Liar,” a Texas boy fired again with out skipping a beat.
“It’d be good for us to have a black lady as president for the primary time in historical past, however my vote’s form of nonetheless on Trump,” added a black woman, who was undoubtedly not of voting age.
“I simply don’t suppose a girl can be proper for our president,” one other Texas woman stated.
“Why do you suppose a girl wouldn’t be proper for president, in your view?” Landrum requested.
“I feel ’trigger solely boys have been president earlier than and that they’d be extra stronger,” the woman responded.
Requested for one phrase to explain Harris, the woman known as her “egocentric,” explaining that “ladies are somewhat dramatic generally.”
Landrum is described by CNN as a “psychologist,” however teaches at ASU’s Walter Cronkite Faculty of Journalism and Mass Communication. Stanford political scientist Shanto Iyengar was the opposite researcher concerned within the research, which doesn’t seem to have been revealed but.
Landrum donated $20 to Harris’ tremendous PAC in July, whereas the research was being carried out. She instructed The Submit in an e-mail Friday that the survey “was not an instructional research” and he or she had been “recruited” by CNN producers “to collaborate on an investigative report analyzing kids’s attitudes towards the candidates operating for president.”
She stated there can be a subsequent white paper issued and was “blissful to reveal” donations to the Harris marketing campaign effort and her standing as a registered unbiased in Arizona.
Iyengar donated $550 to Barack Obama’s presidential marketing campaign in 2008.
Landrum carried out interviews with 10- and 11-year-olds in New Jersey, Texas and Arizona in Might and September, discovering that youngsters in blue states like New Jersey gave “extra excessive responses” when requested questions concerning the 2024 election.
Youngsters within the Democrat-leaning states have been 9 occasions extra prone to specific damaging feelings about Trump, 78, than these in Republican-leaning states have been to specific damaging feelings about Harris, 59.
“What’s the primary phrase that pops into your head once you hear the title Donald Trump?” Landrum requested in one other interview.
“Pure evil,” a New Jersey woman responds.
“Donald Trump is giving his life and his coronary heart,” a Texas woman disagreed when requested concerning the forty fifth president in Might, two months earlier than an assassination try towards him.
“Do you suppose it’s okay for anyone who’s a convicted felon to turn into president of the USA?” the boy who known as Harris a “liar” is requested at one other level.
“Sure,” he replies, with out reservation.
Others — in deep-blue New Jersey — described Trump as “courageous” for surviving “a gun shot” at a marketing campaign rally in Butler, Pa., July 13.
Almost one-third of children, although, appeared centered on Trump’s standing as a “convicted felon” following his “hush cash” case in Manhattan, the sentencing of which was lately pushed again till after Election Day.