Posted in

Comey blasts ‘reckless and ill-conceived’ prosecution – argues fees needs to be dismissed ‘twice over’ in newest courtroom submitting 


Embattled former FBI Director James Comey demanded his case be dismissed Friday, arguing that “basic errors” had been made within the “reckless and ill-conceived” try and prosecute him for allegedly mendacity to Congress and obstructing justice. 

Comey, in a 29–web page submitting in an Alexandria, Va., federal courtroom, cited alleged grand jury rule and Fifth Modification violations by interim US Lawyer Lindsey Halligan in his bid to dismiss the Sept. 25 indictment towards him. 

“These errors mirror the reckless and ill-conceived nature of this prosecution: A president intent on prosecuting Mr. Comey earlier than the statute of limitations expired directed the appointment of a White Home aide, Lindsey Halligan, as interim U.S. Lawyer, and he or she then rushed to safe an indictment whereas flagrantly violating fundamental grand jury guidelines within the course of,” Comey’s authorized crew wrote. 

“These grand jury errors warrant dismissal twice over,” they added. 


Former FBI Director James Comey is sworn in before testifying.
Comey has pleaded not responsible within the case. REUTERS

The doc focuses on alleged “basic errors within the grand jury course of,” which got here up throughout a listening to earlier this week and protection legal professionals fleshed out within the submitting. 

The grand jury “by no means authorized the operative indictment,” protection legal professionals declare. 

“At the least 12 jurors didn’t concur within the operative two-count indictment; and the grand jury rejected the one indictment that the federal government introduced to it,” the submitting states. “The federal government’s try and prosecute Mr. Comey and not using a legitimate ‘indictment of a Grand Jury’ violates the Fifth Modification.” 

The argument stems from confusion that arose when Halligan prompt earlier this week that solely “the foreperson and one other grand juror” had been current when the indictment was handed up. 

Comey’s crew argues the comment alerts that the requisite variety of jurors didn’t see the ultimate model of the indictment, after jurors rejected one of many counts towards the previous FBI director within the three-count indictment.  


Lindsey Halligan, attorney for U.S. President Donald Trump, in the Oval Office.
Lindsey Halligan secured the indictment towards Comey days earlier than the statute of limitations for the fees was set to run out. Getty Pictures

Nevertheless, prosecutors within the US Lawyer’s Workplace for the Jap District of Virginia, led by Halligan, are adamant that federal grand jury procedures had been appropriately adopted. 

In their very own submitting Thursday, Halligan’s crew offered the courtroom with a transcript from the grand jury proceedings which they argue contradicts the protection crew’s declare. 

“[A]ny assertion that the grand jury ‘by no means voted on the two-count indictment’ is contradicted by the official transcript,” Halligan’s crew wrote. 

The transcript “confirms the Courtroom’s recognition that the two-count true invoice is the legitimate, operative indictment,” their submitting continued. 

Within the transcript, the grand jury foreperson affirmed – when requested by the choose overseeing the grand jury – that jurors voted on the indictment with the 2 counts. 

“The whole document eliminates any doubt: The foreperson confirmed the vote. The Courtroom acknowledged the vote. The Courtroom docketed the two-count true invoice because the operative indictment. Solely Rely One lacked concurrence; Counts Two and Three had been true-billed by no less than twelve jurors,” the prosecutors mentioned.

Within the protection submitting, Comey’s legal professionals countered that “there is no such thing as a document of the grand jury seeing the brand new indictment — not to mention voting on it.” 

They describe the prosecution’s efforts to clear up what came about within the grand jury courtroom as “late-breaking” and resting on an “inaccurate overreading of an ambiguous alternate between the grand jury foreperson and the Justice of the Peace choose.”  

Comey’s submitting goes on to argue that “dismissal is independently warranted due to the federal government’s misconduct earlier than the grand jury.”

“Amongst different issues, the federal government relied on info it obtained in violation of the Fourth Modification and the attorney-client privilege; and it made severe misstatements of regulation to the grand jury,” the protection crew argues. 

Comey is scheduled to go to trial on Jan. 5, 2026, and faces as much as 5 years in jail if convicted on each counts.



Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *